AI Studios is the DeepBrain AI avatar video maker: you bring a script, pick a presenter and a voice, and get a business video back. Picasso IA is a catalog of 488 models covering text to video, lipsync, text to speech, images and 3D, with free credits to start and the choice of model left to you.
Picasso IA and AI Studios both end with a video, and they get there from opposite directions. AI Studios is the avatar video maker from DeepBrain AI: you write or paste a script, choose a presenter from a library of ready-made AI avatars (or build one from your own recording or a photo), choose a voice and a language, and the product hands back a presenter-style video. Most of it is arranged around that job and around the teams that need it, such as training, marketing, internal communication and product explainers. Picasso IA is a catalog of 488 models across twelve categories. Its video side is a set of different video models you choose between, plus voice and lipsync models that can make a face speak, so you build the video from parts instead of starting from a presenter.
If your recurring job is a corporate presenter video, AI Studios is arranged for it and Picasso IA is not. It has a presenter library, it turns slides and documents into video, and it carries interactive learning features we do not have anywhere. If your job is a cinematic clip, a product shot, a voiceover laid under footage, a music track or a 3D asset, or if you simply want to run the same prompt through two different video models and keep the better result, Picasso IA is the wider workshop.
The two are less rivals than neighbors, which is why this page spends most of its length on where AI Studios is better and on the cases where you should simply go there. There is also a middle path, which is to use both: a presenter tool for the part of a video where a person talks to the audience, and a catalog for the footage, the sound and the stills around that moment. The sections below cover the free sides, what paying changes, how each one generates, what each covers, and who should choose which.
Eleven rows. The first seven get a yes or a no; the last four need a short phrase, because a tick cannot describe them fairly.
| Feature | Picasso IA | AI Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Library of ready-made presenter avatars | No | Yes |
| Turn slides or documents into a video | No | Yes |
| Interactive quizzes and learning-course export | No | Yes |
| Animate one photo into a lip-synced talking clip | Yes | Yes |
| Voice cloning and speech in many languages | Yes | Yes |
| Generate 3D models from an image | Yes | No |
| Generate images from a text prompt | Yes | Yes |
| Model catalog | 488 models, many labs | An avatar video studio with built-in generators |
| First step | Pick a model, write a prompt | Pick an avatar, paste a script |
| Starting points | Effects and one-click presets | Ready-made video templates |
| Typical output | Clips, images, voice, 3D | Narrated presenter videos |
Picasso IA leads on 1 row, AI Studios leads on 3, and the other 7 come down to what you need.
Take that as a map, not a verdict. The three rows AI Studios wins are the ones a corporate video team lives on: a stock presenter you can put on screen in a minute, a slide deck that becomes a video, and learning content that exports for a course platform. None of that is in our catalog, and no amount of model variety replaces it. The one row we win shows the opposite shape of the product: 3D models are a format a presenter-first tool is not built around. Both sides can make a still image from a prompt, so that row is a tie.
A new Picasso IA account starts with free credits that spend on the same 488 models everyone else uses, so you can try a video model, a voice model and a lipsync model on the same idea before you decide anything. You can also browse the collection and the effects gallery without paying, which shows what the catalog really produces. Generation costs credits, and the cost depends on the model and the settings you pick.
AI Studios lets you start before you commit as well, and a presenter video is exactly the kind of thing worth testing: you can hear a voice, watch a presenter read your own script and judge whether the result looks right for your audience. What the free start includes today is AI Studios' own information to publish and it changes, so check its site rather than trusting a number on a comparison page.
The honest split: if you want to test how a video model handles a shot, a style or a tricky prompt, the free credits here let you try several models side by side. If you want to find out how a stock presenter delivers your real training script, AI Studios is the faster way to that answer.
On Picasso IA, paying buys credits. Every model has its own cost, heavier jobs such as video cost more than a still image, and the price of a run changes with the settings. The numbers live on the pricing page, not in this article, because plans change and a stale figure helps nobody.
On AI Studios, how plans are built and what each tier unlocks is AI Studios' to publish and it changes, so this page does not describe it. Read its pricing page before you decide.
A practical way to decide is to ask what repeats in your month. If you make the same kind of presenter video every week, a product built around that workflow usually pays back in less handling per video. If your work swings between a clip, a voiceover, a poster and the occasional 3D asset, one credit balance that spends across all of them is the simpler fit.
There is one more thing credits change. The same credits and the same models are available through the API, where you create a key in your account, send a request naming a model and its inputs, and get the generated file back. A team that wants to automate clips inside its own tools will find that route in one API for all models. For a person working at a screen, the toolkit does the same job by hand.
This is where the two products stop resembling each other, and it is also where AI Studios' strengths deserve the most room.
AI Studios works from a script and a presenter. You choose an avatar, write what it should say, choose a voice and language, maybe drop in slides, and the product assembles the video around the presenter. The avatar is the center of gravity: the same face and voice can deliver a whole library of videos, which is what makes it useful for onboarding series, product updates, compliance training and multilingual versions of the same message. Because a presenter is the premise, the output is consistent by design. Nobody has to prompt a camera move or worry whether the person on screen will look the same in the next video. It also leans toward the business side of video, with templates, a document-to-video route, dubbing and translation with lip sync, and a conversational avatar for customer-facing use. For a team that does not want to think about models at all, that is a relief rather than a limit.
Picasso IA does not build around a presenter. It builds around choice. In the toolkit you pick a model, write a prompt or attach files, and generate. For video you can choose among models such as Kling v3, Veo 3.1, Seedance 2.0, Wan 2.6 and Hailuo 2.3, and each one has its own strengths in motion, realism, style and length. When a new model appears, it joins the catalog beside the old ones. If the first result misses, you try another model instead of re-scripting a presenter. For a face that speaks, there are models that take a single image and an audio clip, such as Kling Avatar v2 and Omni Human 1.5, and models that re-sync the mouth of an existing video to new audio, such as Lipsync 2. That covers a talking clip. It does not give you a library of stock presenters, a slide importer or a course exporter.
There are two more ways in. Supercomputer is an agent in a chat: you describe the result you want in plain words, it plans the job, picks models from the catalog, renders the steps and shows you the result, and you steer it in the same conversation. It is a separate product from the toolkit, which is where you pick the model yourself. And for builders, the same models are reachable through an API and an MCP server for video generation, so a script or a client such as Claude Code or Cursor can request a clip from the catalog. See the text to video API for the shape of that.
For video, AI Studios covers presenter videos, presentation videos, templates, dubbing and translation, and conversational avatars. It has also added a video generator built on well-known video models, so check its site for the current list. Picasso IA covers generated footage: text to video and image to video from many different models, plus lipsync and avatar-style models for talking faces. If you mean a person speaking to the camera in a corporate setting, AI Studios is the more complete product. If you mean footage that was never filmed, such as a drone shot, a product spinning on a beach or a stylized animation, Picasso IA is where you can compare engines.
For voice, both sides are strong. AI Studios offers a wide range of voices and languages with voice cloning, built to sit under a presenter. Picasso IA offers text to speech models such as ElevenLabs v3 and MiniMax Speech 2.8 HD, a voice cloning model, and ElevenLabs Dubbing, and the audio can go onto any clip, not only a presenter. See the text to speech API if you want it inside your own app.
For images, AI Studios includes an image generator of its own, so a title card or a background can be made without leaving it. Picasso IA has many dedicated image models such as FLUX 2 Pro, Seedream 5 Pro and nano banana pro, which suit thumbnails, posters, storyboards and reference frames.
For music and 3D, the catalog is where the two products part ways most clearly. Picasso IA includes music models such as Lyria 3 and MiniMax Music 2.6, and 3D models such as Hunyuan3D 3.1 and Rodin. AI Studios is centered on video, and as far as its public pages show it does not list either as a feature, so check its site if you need them.
A combination works better than it first sounds. A presenter video often needs a title card, an intro sting, a diagram, a background loop or a thumbnail, and those are the pieces where a model catalog is faster than a stock library. A common setup is the presenter and the script in AI Studios, and the surrounding assets, the voice variations and the short promotional cutdowns made in Picasso IA, then joined in whatever editor you already use. Nothing about either product stops that.
Editing is where a presenter tool and a catalog behave most differently. In AI Studios, editing happens inside the video project: you adjust the script, swap the avatar, change the voice, rearrange scenes, set a background and add on-screen elements. That is the right kind of editing for a presenter video, because it keeps every change tied to the script, so a corrected sentence regenerates cleanly.
Picasso IA edits media you already have. For stills, there are image upscalers such as Topaz Image Upscale and Real-ESRGAN, and Bria Remove Background for cutouts. For footage, there are video models for upscaling and cleanup, such as Topaz Video Upscale and Bria Video Remove Background. You can bring a clip filmed on a phone, or a video made anywhere else, into those models. For a clip whose speech needs to change, the lipsync models re-sync the mouth to new audio.
Neither product is a full timeline editor. If the final cut needs careful trimming, music mixing and titles, you will assemble it in a proper editor after generation. The practical difference: AI Studios is better when the thing you are fixing is the script of a presenter video, and Picasso IA is better when the thing you are fixing is a file.
Neither page can honestly promise a speed, so this one does not. Video takes longer than a still image on any platform, and heavier models take longer than light ones. How quickly AI Studios assembles a finished presenter video depends on its own infrastructure and length of the script, and its own pages are the place for current figures. Any limit that applies to your Picasso IA account is covered on the pricing page or by support, and the same goes for AI Studios on its own site.
Commercial use deserves care on both sides. For Picasso IA, check each model's licence on its page and the platform rules before you build a product or a campaign on an output, because the terms can differ from one model to another. For AI Studios, read its terms for how a finished video, a stock avatar and a cloned voice may be used. On either, use only faces and voices that are your own, that belong to fictional characters, or that belong to people who have clearly agreed, and check the final video for resemblance to a trademark or a real person before publishing.
Eight reasons, four on each side. If your comparison is really about presenter tools in general, the HeyGen comparison covers a closer neighbor, and a video-first view of the catalog is in the Runway comparison.
Choose Picasso IA instead when you want to compare video models on the same idea, need footage that looks filmed rather than presented, want voice, lipsync, images, music and 3D under one account, or want to drive generation from an API, an MCP client or an agent. Browse the full range in the collection.
Most people who use both keep AI Studios for presenter work and add Picasso IA for everything around it, so treat this as adding a tool, not leaving one. Nothing you have built in AI Studios needs to move.
It depends on the video. For footage that was never filmed, for comparing several video models and for adding music, images and 3D around a video, yes. For a corporate presenter video from a script or a slide deck, AI Studios is arranged for that job and Picasso IA is not an equivalent. Many teams sensibly use both, one for the presenter and one for everything around it.
Partly. Models such as Kling Avatar v2 and Omni Human 1.5 take one image and an audio clip and return a talking clip, and Lipsync 2 re-syncs the mouth of an existing video to new audio. What Picasso IA does not have is a library of stock presenters, a slide importer or a presenter-first editor, so a long training series is easier to produce in AI Studios.
Not directly. Picasso IA has no importer that reads slides or documents and builds a narrated video from them. You can approximate it by writing the narration, making the voice with a text to speech model, generating visuals with image or video models and assembling everything in an editor. If a deck becomes a video every week, AI Studios is built for that exact step.
Picasso IA is the stronger fit when you want breadth, because choosing between video models is the whole point of the toolkit. You can run the same prompt through Kling v3, Veo 3.1, Seedance 2.0 and others, compare the motion and the look, and keep the strongest take. AI Studios is organized mainly around presenter, presentation and template videos, and it also offers a video generator, so check its site for the models it covers today.
Yes. The catalog includes a voice cloning model, ElevenLabs Dubbing and several lipsync models, so you can record or clone a voice, translate a script, and match a speaker's mouth to the new audio. AI Studios offers dubbing and translation too, with a more presenter-centered flow. Use only a voice you own or have clear permission to use.
In the toolkit, yes: you pick a model, write a prompt or attach files, and generate. If you would rather not choose, Supercomputer is the agent in a chat. You describe the result in plain words, it plans the job, picks models from the catalog, renders the steps and shows you the result, and you steer it in the same conversation.
Picasso IA runs on credits, new accounts get free credits, and the cost of each generation depends on the model and the settings. Current plans are on the pricing page. AI Studios publishes its own plans, which change independently of this page, so check its site instead of relying on a number written here.
Check before you publish. On Picasso IA, review the licence of each model you used and the platform rules, because terms can differ from one model to the next. On AI Studios, read its terms for finished videos, stock avatars and cloned voices. On both, use only your own face and voice, fictional characters, or people who have clearly agreed.
No. There is no partnership, no affiliate arrangement and no payment in either direction between Picasso IA and AI Studios, or any other product named on these pages. AI Studios appears here because people choosing between a presenter-style video maker and a many-model catalog search for exactly this comparison, and an honest answer helps more than a sales pitch dressed up as one.
Yes, and a generous answer is the honest one. It does one valuable job well: turning a script, a deck or a document into a polished presenter video, in many languages, with a consistent avatar and voice, plus dubbing, translation and interactive learning features that businesses can put to work. A team that makes presenter videos on a schedule gets a lot out of a tool built around that workflow, and many will never need a catalog.
If you would like to see what the other side of video looks like, open the toolkit, pick a video model and try one idea you already have. The free credits are there to be spent on exactly that kind of test.
Choose your language
